What is Antenarrative BENEATH?

The BENEATH-Heart of (fore-conception)

What is True? We have never been truly modern (Latour).  BENEATH the Fore-conceptions, those labels, the opinions, and the dualizing of object and subject, there is the uncovering of BEING.

Duncan Pelly is a True Storytelling Trainer. He has an introduction to individual ontology. Then I will introduce several BENEATH tools to you.

First Tool to go BENEATH we at True Storytelling Institutes, call ‘alignments.’ How to does one aligning what mind is saying, with what heart is saying, and what my speech (discourse) is uttering?

Tool 2 of going BENEATH the fore-conceptions is about moving out of WWOK into grounding of IWOK, and then dissolving that duality altogether.

Going BENEATh is about going deeper than Abstracting in Polemic Narrative-Counternarrative, e.g. the echo chambers of opinions and beliefs. The ‘essence of what is true’ is BENEATH in the uncovering of BEING-in-the-world.

What are BETS of Fore-sight and Fallacy of Plot

David M. Boje, June 9, 2021

True Storytelling helps people move out of ordinary (simplistic) Timing (clock time), and Chronos (strict one-way linear ordering of chronology of past–>present–>future) into an understanding of Kairos (the timing of action). A non-ordinary temporality, moves from Bets-on-the-future (fore-sight) to the rehistoricizing of the past, and how the Present is implicated.

How Bets of Fore-sight relate to the other hearts in doing phenomenological research of ‘True Storytelling.’

7 Antenarrative processes. The task of True Storytelling research is to bring phenomenon of the four hearts (BENEATH, BEFORE, BETS, & BEYOND)into relationships with BEING, BECOMING, and BETWEEN. Encounter the hearts of the matter, in their totality, “experienced as true” and “sense of Being-true” (Heidegger, History of Time book, p. 52-53)

Why is Plot illusion?


It does not encounter worldhood. It leaves out events, characters, and details of history to fashion grand narratives with a linear emplotment of time

It’s because plot-makers cherry pick events and characters. It is because we presume time moves as arrow from past–>present–>future. What if we are in time, not clock time, not chronology, but quantumness of time existence.

Therefore, I move to the antenarrative, the pre-story, the pre-plotted anticipatory resoluteness that is directed toward whatness and “concrete construction of existence” because time and space already antenarrate Being-in-the-world (section# 231, Heidegger Being & Time book).

I am developing a research methodology for True Storytelling processes

Here are some more people who challenge plot as an untrue storytelling:

The Illusion of Plot
“We must hold ourself aloof from all these significations of ‘future, ‘past’, and ‘Present’ which thrust themselves upon us from the ordinary conception of time” (Heidegger, p. 326, History of Time book).


“But it is only in virtue of poetic composition that something counts as a beginning, middle, or end” (Paul Ricoeur, Time & Narrative book, p. 38).

“There is no such thing as an absolute temporal interval or an absolute spatial interval” (Wolf, 2010).

Now we can look at the macro-level of Bets on the future (fore-sight), and see that there is more than one kind of capitalism making bets.

In four-player chess, Each team places their BETS and PLOTS to win the center space, and capture opponents pieces.

Above image from Boje’s book review:

Parry, Glenn Aparicio. (2020). Original Politics: Making America Sacred Again. NY, NY: Select Books, Inc.

and adapts: Plato’s Republic (360 B.C.) Online text, Translated by Benjamin Jowett, accessed Jan 13 2021 at https://www.fulltextarchive.com/pdfs/Plato-s-Republic.pdf

Each Capitalism’s historical narratives claims the other capitalisms are the worst solutions. There is a language game here I would like to highlight. It is a special use of capitalism as a noun-character in an emplotment repeating six adjectives to blame the other guys, while none of the Capitalisms seem to work on the Whole System (processes), and therefore are not solving basic process problems creating the system problems in the first place. 

Tyrany – When Democracy turns towards anarchy the society is said by Francis MacDonald Cornford (1941: 287) to divide into three classes:

  1. Spendthrift Desperadoes
  2. Capitalists Amassing All The Wealth
  3. Country (rural) People Uninterested In Politics

State capitalism – economic system in which the state undertakes business and commercial economic activity and where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned enterprises, or where there is otherwise a dominance of corporatized government agencies or of public companies such as publicly listed corporations in which the state has controlling shares.Wikipedia

Oligarchy As private individuals accumulate their own treasury, a Timocracy falls into ruin. All kinds of legal inventions, happen that remind me of making a corporation in America, a private individual, and an entity that has Freedom of Speech (aka freedom to lie in ads), not to mention Political Action Committees (PACS) that finance political elections and political parties. Plato, interlocutors ask, “what do they or their wives care about the law?” (p. 523, section 687). Tension and division builds as the State tries to become as rich as possible. 

Democracy Democracy comes into Being for Plato as the ‘Democratic man or woman’ brings up the Oligarch’s greed and obvious wealth-disparity, for judgment. This is an ideal model, and the question to be asked: does it happen, in the real?

Wolff ( 2020:iii-vi) says all 4 capitalisms try to solve the same problems: Each Capitalism BEFORE claims the Other capitalisms are the worst solutions (P2 Already There).

Wolff, Richard D. (2020). The Sickness is the System: When Capitalism Fails to Save Us from Pandemics or Itself. Edited by Liz Phillips & Maria Carnermolla. NY, NY: Democracy at Work.

Each Capitalism is a Noun-character, with 6 Adjectives blaming the other guys, but none of them seem to work on the WHOLE SYSTEM (Studium),

A process is an action verb, the capitalisms are nouns, and instead of solving the 3 problems, each blames the other using these 6 adjectives.

1. racism

2. Unemployment

3. Sexism

4. Poverty

5. Inequality

6 Political corruptionwhile Other Capitalisms, increase them

In short, a 4 player game begins to have interaction effects. Their separate linear plot lines mingle to cycle, then can spiral in good or mean ways, and can morph into a rhizome.

POINT:
 it’s a Game of plotting with Noun and Adjectives of blame the other capitalisms, without the Verb (process).

1. Racism/2. Unemployment/3. Sexism/4. Poverty/
5. Inequality/6 Political corruption while Other Capitalisms, increase them

As you can see above, there are multip plots contending in BETS on the Future, at the same time.

Plot line #1 is climate denial, delay, deflect, distraction, disinformation, and deception –> all of which affects the BEFORE, rehistoricizing histories to fit each of the plot lines.

Plot line #2 has Bets of preparing for climate change mitigation. Notice how plot line #1 runs interference to keep sustianable actions from enacting in BEING-in-the-world of SpaceTimeMattering.

Plot line Innovations of both #1 and @ weaves new technologies in ways that help or hinder Green and Red plot line Bets on the Future. For example, to have a Green Technology, means mining for Lithium. Bets on the future, plots about the mining of lithium for batteries for electric cars and trucks. This is the world-mattering of lithium material.

Example Slides:

Can people make BETS on the Future of industry guiding fore-sight to the spacetimemattering of existence.

  1. 68% of animal life gone since 1970 from plot-bets already made
  2. 98% of single-use plastic is never recycled, but the PLOT advertised directs us all to sort it anyway.
  3. In the last year 43% of bee colonies in the USA have collapsed. The root cause is called ‘Neonics’. The big manufacturer of Neonics is Bayer Corporation. ( Neonics are neurotoxic insecticides, meaning they are pesticides designed to kill insects by attacking their nerve cells). The BEOFRE: In the 1980s Shell and in the 1990s Bayer started work on their development.
  4. Next, we look at Plots about lithium and rare earth element (REE) mining companies. These plot affect the carrying capacity of the plaent to support all life species.

Rare Earth Metals (REEs) are tuning out to further the Green and the Red plot lins.

Rare Earth Elements are mined, Bets on the Future made in fore-sight, that rehistoricize the past.

The Negation of the Negation is what one plot another plot. Different plots spiral in their interactions over time and space and mattering. Even though each plot is selective, an approximation, a distortion of BEING, the plots have outcomes and hidden costs for the totaling of Being-in-the-world.

SUMMARY

In BEFORE-Heart we explored how there are different histories. As BETS-Heart process has fore-sight, it is anticipatory, and prompts a rehistoricizing of the BEFORE with each new Bet on the Future. This is a radical notion of time, in comparison to ‘ordinary time’ (e.g. clock time, measured time, and notions of time requiring a separation of past, present, and future). This separation of future, past, and Present of PLOT (Principle 3 of True Storytelling) is not the same as History, and is not the same as Being-there in SpaceTimeMattering of a worldhood. The point is that a plot of a Beginning-Middle-End (BME) narrative is the common understanding of plotting time, but its a dogma that conceals the temporalizing process.

Follett (Dynamic Administration book) says “We have come to the end of our quick exploit of our natural resources” on platnet earth. The Bets-Heart points to BEING-There of spacetime, “there really are mountains, streams, houses, chairs, tables, and the like” (Heidegger, p. 69 in History of Time book). Being-there in-the-world is to “live in the truth” (Heidegger, p. 52 History of Time book).

Bets on the Future weth an ordinary (simplistic) conception of time for-get the fore-getting of BEING, which distorts historical memory of the already there, BEFORE. A blacksmith happen is point (in the direction) toward the place from which it came.

Place-Based True Storytelling

The BETS-Heart points to the Place-of-BEING, and rehistoricizes the BEFORE. This is SpaceTimeMattering by doing story-mapping. Is it an ecological thing (a rock, water, soil living things) or is it a manufactured thing (a chair, table, car, house)? How did the manufactured things come into BEING from the Natured -things. This brings us to the topic of PRO.

What is PROCESS RELATIONAL ONTOLOGY (PRO)?

Mary Parker Follett is famous for PROCESS focus on organizational and environment systems, for changing RELATIONAL participations between management and union by focusing on the Being-ness of situation events and conditions, and moving out of opinions of what is true and untrue into a joint investigation of the ONTOLOGICAL-situation of BEING-in-the-world. In short, Follett does what is called PROCESS, RELATIONAL ONTOLOGY (PRO, for short).

One of our True Storytelling Trainers, Duncan Pelly writes about PRO of Follett:

Pelly, Robert Duncan M; Boje, David M. (2019a). “A Case for Follettian Interventions in Public Universities.” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Accepted Mar 20 2019. Access PDF here.

Pelly, Robert Duncah; Boje, David M. (2019b).Neoliberalism in the North American UniversityToward Integrating Divisions in Agent Orientation Via a Follettian Differentiated Relational Ontologypublished, Communication, Language At Work (CLAW) journal, https://tidsskrift.dk/claw/article/view/116132/164304

BENEATH-Heart (fore-conceptions).

In the BENEATH-Heart people often only accept facts if and only iff they fet their fore-conceptions (beliefs, opinions, already in a storyline). This is why it is important in True Storytelling to go BENEATH into BEING-there, encountering what Heidegger calls “the essence of truth”. Heidegger (1931-1932/2013) ““the essence of truth reveals itself as freedom” (Heidegger, section 5). It is about letting other Being of other species Be, when we turn towards Triple Loop, with a heart of care.” (p. 11 in Boje, Pelly, & Trafimow, in press).

What is the essence of truth? Encounters with Being.

Heidegger, Martin. (1931-1932/2013). The essence of truth: on Plato’s cave allegory and Theaetetus. From lectures delivered 1931-1932 at University of Freiburg. Bloomsbury Publishing. I will cite on line version, based on a translation by John Sallis, accessed Apr 25 2021 at https://aphelis.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Martin-Heidegger-On-the-Essence-of-Truth.pdf

When we begin to study BEING-there, we invite you to go into the world, to encounter Worldhood of Being you are already in, and notice the onto-story. We investigate the discoveredness of Being (p. 257, History of Time book). We connect Timing with Spacing, the ways of temporalizing with the ways of spatializing.

ANTENARRATIVE BLOG

Next –> book length study guide on all the FORES of 7 Antenarrative processes please click here

–> Fore-Having the Before of history https://davidboje.wordpress.com/what-is-the-before-antenarrative-fore-having/

Main TSI Site

What is Being in True Storytelling?

David My Boje, June 21 2021

There are seven antenarrative processes that are pre-constitutive of all narratives and all living stories. Each process supports and extends a True Storytelling Principle (Larsen, Bruun, & Boje, 2021).

I have been developing a method to research Antenarrative Processes. You can see the previous posting, about Bets Fore-having https://davidboje.wordpress.com/what-is-the-before-antenarrative-fore-having/

Notice how all four hearts point to BEING-in-the-world. Being is not just timing, it is spatializing, and mattering. These are inseparable: SpaceTimeMattering. 

Most people think of time in clocktime, and space in length, width, height. These are measurements of something else, the BEING-NESS of spacetimemattering.

OPENING EXERCISE: We have an innate sense of space BEING-itself. Close your eyes. See what is behind & far ahead, on the other side of walls, and more distant in the space earth has in the solar system, and the solar system in the galaxy, and that in the universe. As we inhabit a place we get a sense of spatializing. We spatialize everywhere we are. Space and Time are related. We space things, to account for timing to get things when we need them. This is how a kitchen or a workshop is organized.

Mattering is about different kinds of things that come into together-telling. There are nature’s things (water, air, earth, fire) and there are manufactured things from nature’s things. These mattering things are diverse, heterogeneous, forming inter-relationships, with stories to tell. In ontology, we look to the inseparability of spacetimemattering, observing how people often try to pry the assemblages apart.

We will look at two tools that are for trainers only. The tools are designed to help you understand how people can do more than clocktime and measuring spatial distances. There is something important to discover beyond dualizing subject from object. There is BEING-in-the-world the fore-getting. Fore-getting how spacetimemattering are inseparable, and the ‘fore’ (meaning already there), the ‘getting’ of the spacetimemattering.

Spacetimemattering exploration in True Storytelling sessions has two important tools, chronotopes, and onto-story.

TOOL # 11: CHRONOTOPES

Mikhail Bakhtin develops the history of narrative. Bakhtin admired Einstein’s spacetime (how space and time are inseparable). He unearths 10 chronotopes (spacetimes) that are interactive with one another (some or all of them are interweaving). The 10 are compositional and throughly dialogical. Dialogical chronotopes populate our conversational storytelling (oral, written & performative theatrics).

Let’s begin with 4 adventure chronotops that are centering (centrifugal).The first four are centering and quite popular in organizations. #1 romantic adventure – a good example is the SWOT strategy framework (Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats). Each CEO is on a strong leader adventure to transform their organization: to maximize strengths and opportunities while minimizing weaknesses and threats. But everyday adventures happen suddenly and best laid strategic plans run afoul. The microstoria (little people) observe the biographical narratives of the leaderly characters, noting many shortcomings, and these get retold on the public sqaure (e.g. court cases of McLibel in McDonald’s history; expose journalism). Chivalric adventures are about a few core values, which change from time to time. For example, these days McDonald’s core values:

“McDonald’s core values are anchored on the value of integrity – above all, we do the right thing. That includes speaking up and choosing to challenge accepted practices by advocating for women,” said Reginald Miller, Global Chief Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer at McDonald’s” (source).

Chronotopes 5 to 10 are different. They up=spiral in centrifugal ways. These are ways in which narratives differentiate the artifical and the real, the inauthentic and the authentic, the true from the fake. It is about a search for ‘historical realism, unmasking, and Rabelaisian purge, etc. These spacetime search for grounding (unlike the first 4 which are about abstracting). Here is a summary and some references to organization studies applying each of them

the point here is as you move fromt eh first four to the next six, its about emplacement, generativity of nature, and difference between abstracting and grounding. We can see this as well in the next tool for trianers.

TOOL #12: ONTO-Story

The Onto-Story by Jane Bennett (2010: p. 4) means ontological-storytelling.

Bennett, Jane. (2010).”Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.”

Bennett begins her onto-story,
“On a sunny Tuesday morning on 4 June in the grate over the storm drain to the Chesapeake Bay in front of Sam’s Bagels on Cold Spring Lane in Baltimore, there was…”

Here is an image to help you along. For practice, let’s unpack the onto-story.

Tell the onto-story of things •large men’s black plastic work glove •dense mat of oak pollen •unblemished dead rat •white plastic bottle cap •smooth stick of wood.

I will give an interpretation of BEING of SpaceTimeMattering, an onto-story inspired from Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987 Thousand Plateaus book).

This is a collective assemblage of species (wood, oaken pollen, and rat) with human-manufactured things (plastic bottle cap, work-glove). The principle of heterogeneity applies here. This is a heterogenous assemblage of species and things from other places, finding themselves together outside a restaurant in Baltimore. So the BEFORE Heart applies (the layers of historical origins), and the BETS Heart (the probable disposition, Bets on the Future of each species & thing, including how they will be recycled or not, how they will break down to quantum atomic and subatomic, decomposing).

In short, one onto-story, this collective assemblage is BEING-in-the-world as a rhizome. The Principle of Multiplicity (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987: 8) asserts that the collective assemblage is ceasing tto have the BENEATH Heart duality of “subject and object, natural or spiritual reality, image and world.” The rhizomatic assemblage has determinations, magnitudes, and dimensions in the weave and interplay of the emplacement you can observe in the image above (p. 8). The BENEATH Heart applies, in the search for the subterranean, what is intuitively fulfilled or unfulfilled in the collective assemblage, which is of course not just onto-story of parts, but a together-telling of micro and macro systems at crossroads.

In short, the four hearts, each is getting to the Heart of the Mattering, and all four hearts point to Being-in-the-world of SpaceTimeMattering. Each Heart of the Matter, is different.

We did an onto-story of RHIZOMATIC DISUNITY AND TRANSITION, here are some other antenarrative configurations.

Linear Heart of the Matter (BENEATH) is fore-conceptions of linear direction, a unity of knowledge that totalize by linguistics and semiotics a coded system of stratification of things, and some statistics (as they are known).

The CYCLIC UNITY is about how this trash and accidental emplacement has BEFORE-Heart multiple and different roots, and as with all trash is an ‘eternal return’ of a situation (p 6).

The SPIRAL UNITY. There are movements of the together-telling that form molecular intra-relations, and outer inter-relations all the way into the cosmos. The trash will get shoved and blown around, and possible collected, some recycled, most off to the landfill. There is no recycling of plastic bottle cpas or plastic work gloves. Rats are never recycled, perhaps the smooth piece of tree branch has an afterlife. All these BETS-Heart, on their Future, the probable spiraling path of each and together.

To continue the RHIZOMATIC UNITY and DISUNITY. We are working with notions of deterritorialization of species and things that were in many territories (mining of oil to make polymer resin, to mold into glove and into bottle cap for water bottle or some other bottle). In rhizome onto-story the duality of subject and object breaks down. The configuring interplay between the things (some natural, others human-made) are now thrown into “world [that] has become chaos” (p. 6t ). The mystification BEYOND-Heart of the total BEING in truth, “a system of this kind is called a rhizome” (p. 6). Our of the subterranean, perhaps not entirely rhizomatic, but on their way as an assemblage deterritorialized from their respective territories, are about to be reterritorialized, once again.

Onto-story (Bennett, 2010) combined with Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987) territorialzing-deterritorializing-reterritorializing gives us a way to use Tool#12 Onto-story in ways where all four hearts point to Being-in-the-world, and to the inseparability of SpaceTimeMattering. Onto-story-telling is about collective assemblages of stuff that have plots, roots, relationalities of one thing to anything other. Bennett calls this ‘vibrant mattering’. The life of species that once existed in aliveness, and now are tossed about intermixing with human-made things, that themselves were once Earth elements (fossilized dinosaur bits, water used in excavation, in manufacturing, and virtual water to make and transport stuff or make energy to make stuff). The molecular, the quantum subatomic and the molar supply chaines and recycling idealism not born out on the streets of Baltimore, and most other cities.

BEING & BEHOND: Has the natural world lost its higher unity? BENEATH-Heart: Are the linguistic coded systems of stratification and semiotics, sometimes statistic included coming undone, spacetimemattering-out-of-joint? BEYOND: Are subterranean flows that would otherwise handle the transformation of dead rat, and dead twigs, renewing them, are these no longer able to keep up in the Anthropocene?

Deleuze and Guattari (1987) write about black holes. In this onto-story, recycling falls into a black how, with many complex system process relations to many other effects than what is in front of a restaurant. There are “innovative processes” (p. 334), but alls a collective assemblage fallen into a catastrophic black hole, not just in Baltimore. This crossroad of human behaviors, all deterritorialized, in this void where this assemblage collides, in “vectors of deterrorialization” (p. 334) becoming an interassemblage from the getgo. In short, antenarrative processes already there BEING-in-the-world, in this onto-story are unpacked, for their primary relation to mattering, spatializing, and temporalizing, all at once. There is more going on here than matters of expression or semiotic systems colliding (p. 334). Quantum storytelling, onto-intermolecular forces are in play. This assemblage is on its way, flowing and moving, changing, about to become something else.

The black holes of Baltimore, New York, Las Angeles, and here in Las Cruces, New Mexico–> there could be a more positive rhythm, a deeper understanding of the onto-story-telling, “the resonance of the black hole” (p. 334).

Chronotopes and onto-story-telling are about territorial assemblages coming undone, reterritorializing and deterritorializing, again and again. Each item (see image above is taking lines o flight, yet there is together-telling of BECOMING and BEING in the collective assemblage. Spaces opening to other spaces, times to other times mattering changing again and again.

WHAT STORY HAS WATER TO TELL?

What Story Has Water To Tell? by David M. Boje May 17 2020

After being a storytelling researcher 40+ years, I have come to the conclusion, most westerns in Europe and US, are the least aware of the most important part of their existence, water! Most Western Ways of Knowing (WWOK) do not have the reverence for life of Indigenous Ways of Knowing (IWOK). Water has a story, all its own.

“There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says:

‘Morning, boys. How’s the water?’

And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes

‘What the hell is water?’” (David Foster Wallace, 2005, online).

Let me add a few lines to the Wallace’s story.

The older fish says, ‘Water is an aliveness. Try living without it!’

And the two young fish looked at each other, and one said to the other:

‘What story does water have to tell?’

What is the point of this story? On the surface, the story tells us that like the younger fish, it’s hard for us to see and talk about one of the most important realities of our existence on Earth, ‘water’. To the older and wiser fish, there is always a deeper meaning to the story. In IWOK storytelling, water is a character, a storyteller, a living entity. To WWOK water is a ‘resource’, an object that is inanimate, just two hydrogen molecules fused to an oxygen molecule, nothing more. More on this point in book I am writing on water storytelling.

cover water storytelling

It is past time for storytellers get begin to list to the story that water has to tell (Boje, in press, Storytelling Interventions in Global Water Crisis (Download book, in process, stays online only till published). In both WWOK and IWOK, earth has a fixed world water supply that recirculates that same water that has existed since the big bang. Worldwide, water supply exceeds demand.

“Water is a finite resource: there are some 1,400 million cubic kilometers on earth and circulating through the hydrological cycle. Nearly all of this is salt water and most of the rest is frozen or under ground. Only one-hundredth of 1 percent of the world’s water is readily available for human use” (Water A Finite Resource)

Is there Another Deeper Meaning to the Fish Story?

What if water is more than H2O? What if like the older fish says, water is ‘aliveness’ itself? What if, water is has a story t tell? In IWOK storytelling water is revered as source of life, as aliveness, as water spirit.

“Water is the most life sustaining gift on Mother Earth and is the interconnection among all living beings.  Water sustains us, flows between us, within us, and replenishes us.  Water is the blood of Mother Earth and, as such, cleanses not only herself, but all living things.  Water comes in many forms and all are needed for the health of Mother Earth and for our health.  The sacred water element teaches us that we can have great strength to transform even the tallest mountain while being soft, pliable, and flexible.  Water gives us the spiritual teaching that we too flow into the Great Ocean at the end of our life journey.  Water shapes the land and gives us the great gifts of the rivers, lakes, ice, and oceans.  Water is the home of many living things that contribute to the health and well-being of everything not in the water” (Assembly of First Nations – Honoring Water).

Water is the ‘Place’ of ‘Aliveness’

In our storytelling conversations at the Gaia Storytelling Lab of European School of Governance, we listen to the story water has to tell. For example, water is aliveness, what Jane Bennett (2010) calls ‘vibrant matter.’[1] Vibrant matter has its onto-story (meaning ontological-story) to tell, its story of existence in a quantum storytelling. In onto-story, we observe that every living biotic thing has water sustaining its life in some place of existence on the planet. Water is alive in the mountains and the trees because water is essential to the aliveness of ‘place.’ I live in the desert of New Mexico, on the east Mesa of Las Cruces. We get 10 inches of rainfall a year, and most of it comes in a few downpours, that run off the dried parched land, carrying what’s left of the topsoil away, only the cactus, the mesquite and greasewood can grow here. Places without a few inches of rainfall a year, are lifeless. As I observe the horny toad, the diamondback rattle snake, the tranchila, and scorpion, as well as the bees, ants, and quail, I hear water’s story of aliveness. I also observe the water rights disputes becoming water wars between New Mexico, Colorado, and Texas, and with Mexico, as there is not enough freshwater in the ground aquifers, or the Rio Grande River, to go around. Cities are growing, demanding agriculture surrender water ownership, while meanwhile wildlife riparian soil gets left in water stress or with no water at all, as ‘place’ gives way to more and more development.

How can we tell water’s aliveness-story? Listing these facts about the finiteness of water in the hydrological cycle is less effective than just telling the story of aliveness. You often see these facts” Earth has 332.5 million cubic miles of water, 96.5% of it is saline (Na Cl, aka sodium chloride) but forget the story they tell. More facts don’t help much: 3.5% is fresh drinkable water, but 68% of that freshness is trapped in ice and glaciers, while about 1/3rd is in the ground, which leaves only 2% of freshwater in the rivers, lakes and streams. Here’s a story about water-aliveness.

drinking cleopatra bathwater

“Are we drinking Cleopatra’s bath water?”

“When biologists speak about Cleopatra’s bathwater, what they are playfully illustrating is that the Earth is mainly a closed loop. What’s here today was generally here yesterday. So that cup of tea you’re drinking could once have been Cleopatra’s bathwater!

But if Cleopatra were to bathe in the Earth’s waters today, her skin would crawl and palace heads would roll. Our booming human population is massively disturbing the planetary waters, polluting and straining the ecology of water everywhere” (Kenny Ausubel, undated, online).

The moral and practical wisdom of the Cleopatra’s bath water story and this IWOK notions of water is since we share the finite water that has existed since the beginning of earth’s existence, and that same finite water circulates in the global water cycle, hopefully revitalizing and filtering out the yucky bits of the bath, we bathe in each other’s water, drink each other’s water, just as we breathe each other’s air. We therefore might be advised to revere water, to honor the life-giving role of water, and the cleansing role of the water cycle itself as a living system. What about the recirculating toilet water in the global water cycle?

all water is dinosaur pee

Are we already drinking each other’s toilet water?

Some storytelling is exaggeration. But it’s a fact ‘all water is dinosaur pee!’ On a planetary scale this one is ‘True’ with a capital-T  because dinosaur pee persists in the global water cycle and is recirculating with every kind of water.

Yes, metropolitan cities have wastewater treatment. They also receive their water from upstream and discharge it into the hydrological cycle to be received by other cities downstream. The water supply is not growing in that cycle. The moral of the story: Global water is a closed system with a fixed and finite amount of water circulating in the hydrological cycle, which includes even the flush.

Water has a story to tell, but do we have the awareness to listen?

We are so surrounded by water it is too easy to take it for granted. Again, we can list, more facts, but does this help human understanding of the situation we are in? Water is essential to all life. Our bodies are 85% water when we are born and at age 72, my body is 55% water. I can survive a week without food, but after only three days without water, my body organs shut down for good, and on the fourth day, I’m a goner. The point is ‘water is life’ for every living thing on Earth.

Think of water supply and demand like your bank account. You make deposits and withdrawals, leaving your account balance. We are already overdrawn!

Water Bets Being Made on the Future

 My storytelling research, since 2001, has been developing prospective sensemaking, I call ‘antenarrative’ by studying ‘bets on the future.[2] In storytelling we are told and retold, the bets being made about the future of water. A decade from now:

“According to the U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment of Global Water Security, by 2030 humanity’s “annual global water requirements” will exceed “current sustainable water supplies” by 40%” Source

“… If current usage trends don’t change, the world will have only 60 percent of the water it needs in 2030” Source (Seametrics website).

Earth’s freshwater supply is unevenly distributed on the planet, and is no longer keeping up with demand. The United Nations predicts that by the year 2025, 30 nations will be water scarce. UN predicts by 2030, half the world’s population will live in places with ‘high water stress.’ “Hydrologists regard countries where indigenous water supplies average less than 1,000 cubic meters per person per year as ‘water-scarce’” (Water-A Finite Resource). Warmer air from climate change (aka global heating) means more water vapor is stored in the air, more ice and glacier melts, as the soil gets hotter, demanding more water.

Here is another parable-story about how unaware humankind is about water.

Earth’s water supply is dwindling as ‘drought-like conditions become the new normal’ (Sean Keach, Dec 17, 2018).

“Climate change is producing more rain, but the world’s water supply is shrinking – and now scientists know why.

Scientists have warned that global warming is drying out the planet’s soil, which could create a world where ‘drought-like conditions become the new normal.’”

“…Less water into our rivers means less water for cities and farms. And drier soils means farmers need more water to grow the same crops.

“Worse, this pattern is repeated all over the world, assuming serious proportions in places that were already dry.”

Will water become more expensive than oil?

“It raises a particularly dystopian question: could water, one of the world’s most abundant resources, ever be more expensive than one of its rarest, oil?

“It already is,” says Dr Brian Cook, a researcher in Development Geography.

He’s right.

In Australian supermarkets, a bottle of Mount Franklin Spring Water costs around $3.33 a liter. At the pumps in mid-February 2018, the average cost of a liter of unleaded petrol is less than half that, at $1.38.

The end of days already stalks our supermarkets.” (Ed Mccracken, March 7 2018).

As the world’s fixed water supply dwindles, water capitalism turns it into a privatized commodity. Water speculators buy land with freshwater rights, waiting for water to become the new oil, and then just cash in. The consequences of our lack of water awareness, like the two young fish swimming, they do now know ‘what is water?’

Water has a story to tell. It is a story of water-aliveness, the agential character of water in the aliveness of this planet. Using living freshwater to make plastic water bottle products is a waste of aliveness.

Storytelling With More than Statistics

Time to make my point. Statistics don’t communicate as well as a storytelling demo. For example, I could tell you, that the USA consumes 50 billion plastic water bottles a year. 23% head to recycling, but 38 billion don’t go to recycling, and then only about 9% actually gets recycled, because China is no long taking them, and because it costs $$$ to sort the bottles, shred them, wash them, heat them to sanitize, then melt into pellets and sell to beverage companies. Your eyes glaze over, you are reaching for your cell phone, because humans are storytelling animals, not fact repositories.

I do this demo at conferences to tell the water and oil story, behind the water bottle story.

Oil in those plastic water bottles

To wake up an audience, I fill several water bottles with feed water (the virtual water in the supply chain to make them) plus I fill a ¼ liter of oil on a fourth bottle. That is a way to do visual storytelling of the waste of bottled water production and consumption, at a time when the water demand exceeds water supply on the planet.

As water commodification continues to escalate, billions of gallons of water are used to make the billions of gallons of water in water bottles. It takes 3 feed waters to make 1 final bottle of water, and lots of oil. 50 billion USA plastic water bottles is 17 million gallons of oil. You have to include the virtual water it takes in the plastic water bottle supply chain. It takes 6,000 mega joules of electricity for each barrel of oil, and with all the oil for 40 billion bottles that is 106 billion mega joules of electricity, which is how the 25% oil calculation is based on.

More at https://davidboje.com/water

[1] Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

[2] Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. Sage. Available Research Gate

 

Quantum Storytelling Manifesto: Alternatives to End Zoonotic Coronaviruses Spreading in Global Capitalism

Quantum Storytelling Manifesto: Alternatives to End of Zoonotic Coronaviruses Spreading in Global Capitalism by David M. Boje, March 22, 2020

Abstract

Quantum storytelling focuses on the interconnectivity of nature at a particle-wave level, how humans are entangled with other species, and has solutions to zoonotic coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks. The lesson to learn from the coronaviruses (CoVs) is it is not bats, birds, or camels to blame for pandemics, but the ways humans are interacting with other species that is responsible. We the humans are complicit in destroying wildlife habitats. As human population continues to grow, Big Ag and suburban sprawl are deforesting nature’s wildlife habitats, dewatering rivers, creating climate change, all this while global capitalism provides pathways of interconnectivity, and more zoonotic pandemic in our future. This perfect storm of a future of one pandemic wave after another, just like each of the last three decades (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, & COVID-19) needs a viable alternative. Here I will suggest we change the storytelling of capitalism and do some realistic restorying. To change the pandemic future we must change the source of the problem, human behavior in late modern capitalism.

 

Introduction

 

It is time to change our human behavior. To change behavior we must change our storytelling. This means changing global capitalism storytelling. My colleagues and I have been developing quantum storytelling as way to understand the ongoing storytelling dynamics of our sociomaterial world. The point of this essay to understand is the quantum storytelling solution means actually changing human behavior that is destroying wildlife habitats. It means challenging dominant narratives of what life is all about. The implication of quantum storytelling is changing human behavior is easier and wiser than techno fix vaccine for each new virus outbreak. There are thousands of CoVs, waiting in the wings. Designing techno fix for each one is profitable to Big Pharma and to short-sell stock manipulators, but futile to our existence. Restoring the natural habitats of wildlife species reestablishes the species barrier by lessening species-entanglement at the quantum level.

 

What is Quantum Storytelling? Quantum storytelling (Boje, 2014; Boje & Henderson, 2014; Boje, 2016; Henderson & Boje, 2016; Boje, 2019) is about the whole system. Quantum storytelling includes prospective sensemaking, antenarrating different possible futures coming our way. The Quantum Storytelling paradigm (theories, methodologies, & intervention practices) is something we created as part of the ‘Quantum Storytelling Conference’ [https://davidboje.com/quantum] (Boje & Henderson, 2014; Henderson & Boje, 2016; Boje & Sanchez, 2019a, in press).

 

How is quantum storytelling relevant to Zoonotic CoVs? According to World Health Organization (WHO), more Zionistic pandemics are headed are way. Zoonosis is all about how germs spread between animals and humans. Germs, those viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi of concern enroll in zoonotic diseases. According to the CDC, animals can spread 6 out of 10 infections, found in humans. We have witnessed the increase in Influenza B (spreads among humans) and Influenza A (from animals to humans). While the media is distracted by Trump tweets, about fake news, the ‘true storytelling’ (Boje, Larson, & Bruun, 2016, & in press) is being side lined, and the global water future of the world gets much less attention.

 

Quantum storytelling can help us understand why it is that people when faced with a crisis, rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, keeping a death grip on their routines, as the ship sinks after it collision with an iceberg.

 

  1. People in crisis hang on to the dominant narratives of the way they have always done it.
  2. This privileges the ‘There Is No Alternative’ (TINA) Narrative, business-as-usual Narrative, & consumption-as-usual Narrative path to the future.
  3. Even faced with significant pandemic statistics, people cling to outworn dominant narratives with a death grip, hoping and praying for return to normalcy.

 

Quantum storytelling begins with an assessment of the total situation, its complete history, not a superficial TINA narrative that pushes all other solutions to the side. The Quantum Storytelling Paradigm is about the interconnection of all life, and its mostly watery quantum soup that connects us all. Be it animate or inanimate, there is movement at the subatomic quantum level.

 

The Historic Rise of Pandemic Infections “The world’s 7.6 billion people represent just 0.01% of all living things… humanity has caused the loss of 83% of all wild mammals and half of plants, while livestock kept by humans abound.”[1]

 

  1. 1920s – HIV crossed from chimps to humans in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Probably result of chimps carrying the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV), a virus closely related to HIV, being hunted and eaten by people living in the area.[2]

 

  1. 1976 – EBOLA 1976 is 2 different viruses Zaire ebolavirus and Sudan ebolavirus (Democratic Republic of Congo, at Ebola River) – likely spread from African Fruit Bats to Gorillas, chimpanzees, and other mammals, then to people.[3]
  2. 1996 – Bird Flue from geese in China. Asian H5N1 detected in humans in 1997 during a poultry outbreak in Hong Kong.[4]
  3. 1998 NiPah virus outbreak in Malaysia, then to, Singapore, India, and highest cases in Bangladesh. Fruit bats to pigs to humans.[5]
  4. 2002 & 2003 – SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) According to the World Health Organization (WHO), as of July 2003, a total of 8,437 people worldwide became ill with SARS and 813 died during the outbreak or epidemic.[6]
  5. 2009 – Swine Flu (H1N1) found in human beings in Mexico, Six of the genes are closest in sequence to pigs in North America around 1999-2000.[7]
  6. 2012 – MERS –CoV (Middle East respiratory syndrome, beta coronavirus), also known as camel flu, probably derived from bats, then jumped species to camels, then to humans 1360 cases 527 deaths to date.[8]
  7. 2013 (mar 30) Avian Flu (H7N9) detected in six different provinces and cities in China (Shanghai, Anhui, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Beijing, and Henan). [9]
  8. COVID-19 (Coronavirus 2019) – “Coronaviruses are zoonotic, meaning they are transmitted between animals and people’ (WHO). Mostly likely transmitted from bats, to intermediate animal, and to humans at ‘wet market’ in Wuhan, China (city larger than NYC), selling exotic and wild animals for food. Part of billion-dollar wild animal industry selling sea turtles, civet cats, pangolins, macaque monkeys tiger cubs, snakes, bats, etc. Currently 290,316 infected, 11,953 deaths, and 93,618 recovered.[10]

 

 

The pandemic infections are increasing in number and severity in recent decades. More are coming. Zoonotic viruses jumping animal species to infect humans have been increasing in frequency over the past several decades. Selling wild animals, endangered species, and exotic animals for food and pets is a dangerous practice. Outdoor ‘wet markets’ and farmer’s markets, selling wild animals for food is widespread in many East Asian and Latin American countries.

 

Dominant narratives are pretenders, attempting to subvert the whole system to one monologic emplotment. Dominant narratives are particular attractive to strongmen leaders, to dictatorial nations, and to oligarchic nations. With each dominant-narrative come the rise of resistance movements and their propagation of counternarratives. Dominant-narratives and counternarratives are in dialectical polemics, each blaming the other in divisive geopolitics. Fortunately, quantum storytelling includes more than the usual dominant-narrative and counternarrative dialectics. By the way, this particular strand of dialectics produces polemic rounds of thesis-antithesis, without much synthesis.

 

Quantum Storytelling of Whole System Complexity Quantum storytelling looks at complexity dynamics of the whole system. In particular, the focus is on how dialectical processes are interactive with more dialogical processes. While the strongmen leaders and various nation states and capitalist industries pursue technofixes to get back to ‘business-as-usual’ there are dialogical processes to be considered. There is for example the Gaia storytelling movement, to give a listen to the voice of nature and her storytelling. That message is clear: deforesting increases climate stress and the risk of pandemics such as CoVs. The point here is it is the dialogical storytelling movements that are seeking to understand the critical control points that can prevent future zoonotic spillover from wildlife to human species from continuing to happen, again and again.

 

In quantum storytelling, we can begin to realize there are many species not just the human kind, and we are all entangled. To change the future, it is humans that must adopt new behaviors. This means that capitalism-as-usual much change. However, the political economy is producing dominant narratives about how technofixes and corporate bailouts will allow return-to-normalcy, a return of business-as-usual. The counternarrative is capitalism needs to morph, to adopt degrowth. But, as the degrowth theorists of the 1970s found out, wealth and privilege push an economics of more and more growth, along with increasing wealth inequality, all while destroying more and more Earth natural habit to fuel more economic growth, etc.

 

The COVID-19 pandemic is being used by the purveyors of dominant narratives of economic recovery to set aside environmental concerns about climate change, water scarcity, deforestation, desertification, acid rain, and so on. In this way, as the counternarratives attest, petrochemical, Big Ag, and Big Pharma are able to engage in still more habit destruction, which in turn, sets the stage for more CoV zoonotic pandemics, more climate change, and more species annihilation, including most of the least wealthy human population.

 

Conclusion

For the Zoonotic CoVs to end, we must change our own human behaviors. The myth that prosperity capitalism, the business-as-usual of fossil fuel driven growth economics is possible to sustain is untenable. More technofixes, more vaccine production Big Pharma, will not save humanity form more pandemics.

 

Quantum storytelling is about the big picture, how entangled humans are becoming with CoVs as the natural habitat of wild life and its natural species barriers are being destroyed first by deforestation, second by Big Ag land use, and third by suburban sprawl. The solution is to begin to understand how TINA-narratives driven by neoliberal dreams of wealth accumulation are producing not only a destruction of the carrying capacity of Earth, but unleashing one pandemic after another, justifying doing noting, by the grand narrative of technology will save us all from the next pandemic. Clearly the historical record proves just the opposite. Technology is in the service of power and wealth, not in the interest of making things better for human or any other specie.

 

A realistic solution is get off the strong leader bandwagon. Give Mother Nature a listen. Do what my colleagues call Gaia Story Listening (More at https://davidboje.com/Gaia.

 

References

Boje, D. M. (2014). Storytelling Organizational Practices: Managing in the quantum age. London: Routledge.

Boje, D. M. (2016). But that’s not a story! Antenarrative dialectics between and beneath Indigenous living story and western narratives. Pp. 69-72 in Grace Ann Rosile (ed.) Tribal Wisdom for Business Ethics. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Boje, D. M. (2019). Global Storytelling: There is No Planet B. Singapore/London/NY: World Scientific.

Boje, D. M., & Henderson, T. L. (Eds.). (2014). Being quantum: Ontological storytelling in the age of antenarrative. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Boje, D. M.; Larsen, Jens; Brunn, Lena. (2017). ‘True Storytelling: How to succeed with your implementation’, working paper. http://oldfriendsindustries.com/?page_id=1048

Boje, D. M.; Sanchez, Mabel (2019a). The Emerald of Handbook of Quantum Storytelling Consulting. UK: Emerald Press

Boje, D. M.; Sanchez, Mabel (2019b). The Emerald of Handbook of Management and Organizational Inquiry. UK: Emerald Press.

Henderson, Tonya L.; Boje, David M. (2016). Managing Fractal Organizing Processes. NY/London: Routledge.

 

 

Footnotes

[1] Guardian.com accessed Mar 21, 2020 at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/21/human-race-just-001-of-all-life-but-has-destroyed-over-80-of-wild-mammals-study

[2] https://www.avert.org/professionals/history-hiv-aids/origin

[3] https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/history/summaries.html

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/h5n1-virus.htm

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nipah_virus_infection

[6] https://www.emedicinehealth.com/severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome_sars/article_em.htm#what_is_the_cause_of_sars

[7] https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-6-207

[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_respiratory_syndrome

[9] https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/260025#1

[10] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

The VIRT: The History of the Future of Storytelling

Liziqu

Figure 1: Liziqi has 8 million plus followers

Turn on the little bell🔔 for notification and be the first one to watch Liziqi’s videos on her YouTube channel. Watch her make gourmet meals out of vegetables, fruits and animals she raises on her farm in rural China.  Watch her make furniture and baskets out of bamboo. Watch her make an outdoor oven, then prepare a gourmet meal for her grandmother. Why have billions of people have tuned into Liziqi’s YouTubes, each one showing how the future could have been, once was, but will never be for humanity? Try this video about the story of sesame cake was launched January 31, 2019, on that last day of the year, and has already over two million views. Soon it will have ten million views.

When the pan meets sesame cake, you think there will be a story?

There are enough fragments to predict the future of storytelling.  As Walter Benjamin (1936) predicted ‘storytelling is coming to an end.‘ We will be watching The future is arriving.Liziqi has videos for all the seasons:

Spring 春之卷:https://is.gd/EBwo2n

Summer 夏之卷:https://is.gd/i1jJ46

Autumn 秋之卷:https://is.gd/YBVeL2

Winter 冬之卷:https://is.gd/3JqW8D

We are mesmerized by how seamless her life with Mother Earth, with Gaia’s living natural systems can be. We are also sad because she can do things our ancestors took for granted, but now these are skills beyond our grasp.

Li Ziqi gathering ingredients for sesame cake meal

Figure 2: Liziqi gathering forest ingredients to prepare her sesame cakes

Our future is coming into focus. We will watch how life once was, but will never be again. We can decipher the history of the future. In the future we are interconnected by the Feed, we are all connected to the VIRT. VIRT is short for Virtual. It has no wires, no cell phones, no computer screens. We have a chip implanted at birth, and we see the VIRT-screen in our mind’s eye. Amazon Prime’s new series the FEED, is the history of the future.

The Feed Amazon Original

Figure 3: The FEED, an Amazon Prime Original

“Based on Nick Clark Windo’s 2018 novel of the same name, this Amazon drama follows the family of Lawrence Hatfield, the creator of a technology that “enables people to share information, emotions and memories instantly.” But like so many well-intended creations, The Feed isn’t immune to missteps” More. It’s a cautionary tale of technology versus humanity. Actually it is much more than that. It’s the VIRT, the history of the future. It is a cautionary tale of the the growing gap between humanity and Nature. It is the future when Gaia storytelling can no longer be heard by anyone by Liziqi.

There was a time when storytelling was alive and then it wasn’t. It was alive when people were enmeshed with Nature. For thousands of years, Boje’s were farmers. My father grew up on my grandfather’s farm along the Little Spokane River that flowed into the Columbia, and into the Pacific Ocean. My mother grew up in the forest, and both my grandparents, on my mother’s sider, rode horses, prospected for gold, and sold moonshine. Most people were from generations of farming families, from people who toiled the land, or roamed the wild. Farmers had large families, who know how to raise animals, plant seeds, make quilts, plows. and horseshoes.  They could collect honey from the hive, build their own homestead. Now the people who make things live in China.

Liziqi picking blooming flowers to make aromatic Dew soup.png

Figure 4: Liziqi picking blooming flowers to make aromatic Dew soup

In the future, we are all plugged into the VIRT, receiving Amazon’s FEED, watching Liziqi make dew soup out of flower blossoms picked from the forests of Mother Nature. Of course, you all know that with global heating, the forests are deforested to make more agribusiness, to make more fertilizer and pesticide, to grow more feed for the cows, to sell more McDonald’s hamburgers.

Cyborg enhancements. We live in an increasingly artificial world, a plastic world. The US alone consumes 50 billion plastic water bottles a year. By the year 2050, the oceans will contain more plastic than fish. A recent report projects the oceans will contain at least 937 million tons of plastic and 895 million tons of fish by 2050. More.  We all know this. We know that the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) have failed, just as the UN Millennium Goals failed in 2015. The United Nations Millennium Declaration, signed in September 2000 commits world leaders to combat poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, environmental degradation, and discrimination against women. … to ensure environmental sustainability; and. to develop a global partnership for development Declaration, signed in September 2000 commits world leaders to combat poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, environmental degradation, and discrimination against women. … to ensure environmental sustainability; and. to develop a global partnership for development. More. We know that each day over 6,000 children die of water-borne diseases that are entirely preventable.

The truth is multinational corporations are dealing with the growing number of water shortages around the world, by privatizing water, raising the price of the water, so soon only the wealthy will afford freshwater.  The oligarchs have taken over the governments of the most polluting countries in the world, the ones burning the most fossil fuel, creating the most greenhouse gas, heating the planet, so ‘yes’ our planet is heating up, well beyond the target of 1.5 degrees C by 2030, most likely 4 degrees, some say 6 degrees C by 2100.  Liziqi’s YouTubes will have billions of subscribers then.

The VIRT is our future. Soon cellphones and laptops will be relics of the past. Soon we will be cyborgs as Donna Haraway (2006) predicted, and in the future, everyone plugged into Amazon’s FEED. Well, not everyone, of course. With growing wealth inequality, the wealthy class will get premiere connectivity, 24/7 access to the best channels. Most will be second class VIRTs, virtual slave cyborgs. A few will, as Jeff Noon (1993) predicted, be in Manchester, searching of Vurt-feathers, laced with opioids.

The life of VIRT slaves. We all can read the writing on these walls. We see people increasingly addicted to cell phones. I teach so I know how hard it is to be lively enough so students look up from their screens, or take the ear buds out, to tune in to face-to-face.  Universities are going digital with digital libraries and distance education. Who needs face-to-face anymore.  People meet, more and more, in chat rooms, using dating apps. The future of the world is being written in these fragments. We are being conditioned to join the FEED, most of us becoming VIRT slaves, a few wealthy class folks, not working at all.

What does a VIRT slave do? Plug in, give your body and soul over to the FEED, let the oligarchs control your body, while you enter a fantasy world, a virtuality where you really do not know what you are doing. We see this in multinational corporations, in universities, in government. You are part of an algorithm, a script run by a computer program, telling you which boxes to pack, where to ship them, how many you can pack in a minute.  In operations research, the ability to write a production-level code is one of the sought-after skills. Lear to write algorithms into a python file to be imported as a module. It’s all part of fractal production, the way supply chains are run these days. Imagine what they will be like by the year 2100.

The VIRT slaves serve the class interests of the VIRT class who has the wealth to buy clean water. We could all be like Liziqi but we have forgotten the skills, become cyborgs, while the planet heats up.

On Sept 20 2019, the largest demonstration in the history of the world was led by a 16 year old teen, Greta Thunberg, but the strongmen leaders of the most polluting nations turned a death ear, and tuned into the VIRT, dreaming of the FEED.

You say ‘this could never happen.’ No one would put a chip in their body, and be ever connected to the FEED. Are you sure? Storytelling has come to an end (Benjamin, 1936). We have left Gaia behind, and are no longer able to hear her calling to us. We have joined the progress narrative, swallowed the Kool Aid, and are writing the history of our future with each new iPhone series.

References

Benjamin, Walter. (1936). The Storyteller: Reflections on the works of Nikolai Leskov.” W. Benjamin, Illuminations. Edited with an Introduction by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. London: Jonathan Cape (1970): 83-109.

Haraway, D. (2006). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 117-158). Springer, Dordrecht.

Noon, Jeff. (2001). Vurt. 1994. London: Pan.

 

Six Antenarrative Questions Behind Storytelling

6 Antenarrative Questions Behind Storytelling BOJE Nov 24 2019.png

  1. WHO BENEATH plots our abstracting narrative roles? We have an example in New York Times Nov 24 2019. “Every one is playing their assigned role in a  drama where the ending seems knowing in advance as the House of Representatives heads toward a likely party line vote to impeach the president, followed by a Senate trial which will not convict him.”  This is the usual dialectic of narrative-counternarrative playing out in US politics. It’s two monologics in opposition See Bakhtin (1973, p. 12) “…narrative genres are always enclosed in a solid and unshakable monological framework. ”Theoretic narrative posits mono-system-wholeness, mergedness, representational coherence, and finalizedness. His counter-move is to treat story as a dialogic; what he terms the “polyphonic manner of the story” (Bakhtin 1973, p. 60).”
  2. WHICH BETS are futuring now? The futures are arriving, several at once, and we can prepare in advance for ones we want to help manifest.
  3. WHEN future’s REHISTORICIZING BEFORE?  My theory of time is with each bet on the future, a prism of diffracting opens to shine light on a history to justify it.
  4. WHAT lies BEYOND flashes of intuition? For Kant the Beyond was in the universal hereafter, but for Hegel the spirit manifests in-the-world. Marx ignored spirit for the material conditions. Me I am a shamanic apprentice, so there are many lower and upper world spirits that manifest.
  5. WHERE’s the grounding BETWEEN living stories? Living stories are, for me, always indigenous ways of being (IWOB) and indigenous ways of knowing (IWOK). Some poststructuralists such as Mikhail Bakhtin noticed the polyphonic dialogism of [living] stories and how narratives are always monologic. We are between other dialogisms: stylistics, chronotopic, and architectonic (has ways of moving beyond Kant’s cognitive architectonic).
  6. WHY we’re all BECOMING answerable to Heart-of-Care?  As a young man Mikhail Bakhtin wrote about the difference between the bystander (special) answerability and a moral answerability to intervene in wrong-doing when we are the person there in the once-occurrent event-ness of Being.

These six antenarrative questions help get us to all that is pre-narrative and pre-story, out of which the grand narratives and the living stories become constituted. At Cabrini University we worked on an Iceberg way of developing the 6 B’s of Antenarrative.

iceberg REVISED of the b's.png

Grace Ann and I just returned from France. Here are some slide sets from France: Continue reading “Six Antenarrative Questions Behind Storytelling”

Constellation Storytelling Revolutions

What’s your living story? Most people don’t know their own living story. We grow up learning to recite our career narrative, but that’s not a living story. A living story has a place, a time, and a mind (an aliveness all its own). A living story exists in a web of living stories, each interrupting the other’s telling, and always unfolding in the middle, without the usual narrative beginning-middle-end linear time concept (Jørgensen & Boje, 2010).

Storytelling Constellations Our ‘living stories’ are part of ‘storytelling constellations’ that are not usually in a translatory motion.  The stories are not moving in one common direction. We can move beyond the translatory motion concept. We can also move beyond the “rectilinear time concept” (Arendt, 1963: 19), and this brings us into storytelling patterns of today’s super wicked complexity: climate change, climate denial, global warming, peak oil, peak water, plastic pollution, and the awareness sixth extinction is happening (Boje, 2019a).

Does your living story move within a constellation of living stories? In Tamara-land (Boje, 1995) I theorized storytelling organizations that were outside the rectilinear time concept. In storytelling organizations, we are not all in the same time, engaging the matters at hand (Boje, 2008).

tamara-final-mansion-cover5.jpg

Figure 1: Tamara-land, chancing living stories from room to room

For example, in the Disney corporation, people are in different rooms, in different buildings, in different countries. Storytelling is simultaneous, and you cannot be every place at once. So you are chasing living, unfolding stories, from place to place, and rely on digital technology, hallway catchup storytelling conversations, and so on, with those who were in other places or in touch with those in other places.

How do Spirals of Storytelling Constellations Work?

Is your living story moving about the same axis of the storytelling constellation? One of the earliest multi-directional spiral theories was proposed by Plato. Plato describes a twisted double spiral, with multiple whorls being spun by three Sirens: Atropos, Clothos, and Lachesis. (Boje, 2019b) They are spinning whorls to weave each person’s life line in Plato’s conception of time.  Atropos turns the inner whorls of the future. Clotho turns the middle whorls of the present. Lachesis turns the outer whorls of the past.

“…singing of past, present, and future, responsive to the music of the Sirens; Clotho from time to time guiding the outer circle with a touch of her right hand; Atropos with her left hand touching and guiding the inner circles; Lachesis in turn putting forth her hand from time to time to guide both of them” (Plato, p. 119).

Depending on the spinning they do, this is your life story, your destined path. The lower part of the spiral, is where the unjust are punished, then renewed, reincarnated to try it all over again.

Twisted_Double_Spiral_Boje_2017.png

Figure 3: Double Twisted Spiral in Plato’s The Republic (drawing by Boje)

Storytelling organizations keep trying to convince themselves and spectators that they are moving in one direction. They keep trying to brand themselves with a petrified beginning-middle-end narrative, and then letting people go who have a different story to tell. On flip day, if those who worked for an acquired community bank could not stick to the contrived Well Fargo script, they no longer had a job.

One has to ask if we are moving about a spiral axis, like a rope tied to a May Pole.  Is the rope at a fixed length so we move in perfect rotations around the axis, in cycle after cycle of some job, doing the same thing day in, day out?  More likely the spiral is shorting , so the rope attached to the May Pole gets shorter, or unravels, getting longer.

CautiousNastyAsianpiedstarling-max-1mb.gif

Figure 4: Spiral of Growth of Neoliberal Capitalism in Anthropocene 

Neoliberal capitalism has the monologic of the growth spiral that actively resists any other logic, such as zero growth. The problem with the growth spiral is it keeps extracting more and more planetary resources, and exceeding planetary boundaries.

Planetary_Boundaries.png

Figure 5: Planetary Boundaries being Exceeded (http://biomovies.tve.org/planetary-boundaries/)

As the growth spiral of neoliberal capitalism continues, more planetary boundaries are exceeded, such as fresh water availability, chemical pollution, etc. We need some storytelling beyond the Anthropocene (Nelson, 2013).

We need a Revolution Not Just a Rebellion 

A revolution shoes aim is freedom in order to usher in a new error is not the same as a rebellion.  We have been unwinding the growth spiral since the industrial revolution and now there is growing awareness of the global warming, and some efforts to keep average global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius. But the spiral growth of late modern capitalism has crossed so many planetary boundaries that puts multispecies storytelling ahead of humancentric storytelling (Haraway, 2016), so all our survival is not at risk.  I joined Extinction Rebellion. I hope that politicians will want to avoid traffic sit ins and declare climate emergency. Still I am a skeptic at heart.  The dice are loaded in favor of neoliberal growth spiraling. The political game is rigged in favor of the oligarchy who funds political campaigns to prevent the Extinction Rebellion from prompting a shift in economic policy. Maybe its time to have Corporate Extinction Rebellion. 100 corporations are responsible for over 70% of CO2 emissions, but they are resisting, funding the climate denial, financing the political campaigns.  I want to be optimistic, and believe that Extinction Rebellion will change all that.

In constellation storytelling, the motion of all living stories is considered in their constitutive relational patchers. One force wants to curtail the planetary boundary crossing, and the other wants to cross at every revolution (every whorl).

giphy-4.gif

Figure 6: Double Twisted Spiral (Source)

Spirals have their revolutions, and their evolutions. In the above image of a double twisted spiral, my telling is the resources or earth are being drained to feed the ever-expanding neoliberal capitalist growth of fossil fuel production and plastic consumer products. As the course of history suddenly begins anew, there is potential emergence for a new story to begin “entirely new story, a story never known o told before” and is about to “unfold” and never was known prior to this revolution (Arendt, 1963: 23): “none of the actors had the slightest premonition of what the plot of the new drama was going to be.”  Where does the novelty story develop its innermost meaning, its plot, and how does it manifest to actors and spectators? (p. 21).

What forces are causing the constellation storytelling movements and motions?

There are elements of “novelty inherent in all revolutions” (Arendt, 1963: 19) including the spiral revolutions in the storytelling constellation. Unique novelty event change a linear pattern into a cyclic, and novelties in the cyclic events, prompt a spiral to emerge, and then as the axis of the spiral ceases its centering power, there are rhizomatic patterns (Boje, 2011).

images

Figure 7: Ron Finley’s Pool Art in Los Angeles (source)

At the Big Story conference, Ron Finley (http://ronfinley.com) showed me his pool art, a painting of the cyclical, rhizomatic, cyclical, and linear antenarrative patterns. I have been trying to sort out how all four are entangling in storytelling constellations.

Here I want to focus on peaceful revolution, with some Extinction Rebellion, whose aim is liberation from oppression of the multispecies, in order to usher in a new story of freedom, beginning a new story as year one.  We are caught up making revolutions around the axis of neoliberal capitalism growth spiral, when the new story, to begin its year zero, needs to unfold in zero growth, that is unknown in the history of capitalism. Arendt asserts that liberation and freedom are not the same thing.

  1. Liberation from fossil fuel capitalism may be the condition of freedom to do something else, but we are still in big trouble if its done in the growth spiral of every-expanding neoliberal capitalism.
  2. Not everyone has a desire for freedom from the business-as-usual growth spiral of oligarchy having power over democracy, power over tyranny, and power over socialism. There is money for the .1% to make by keeping the game of business-as-usual in play.
  3. For others, liberation from neoliberalism looms large as the very foundation of freedom to create a green capitalism
  4. Is a path of freedom just non-existent in the powerful whorls of neoliberal growth spiral momentum? It seems political leaders of the U.S>, Australia, France, UK, and so on are not concerned with moving along to a post-carboniferous capitalism
  5. Does neoliberal capitalism sell us on triple bottom line (3BL) and circular economy (CE) as two ‘greenwashing’ plots to keep the business-as-usual growth spiral turning out more useless production for mass consumption? See critique of CE on Wikipedia).
  6. Perhaps the buzz over stop using plastic straws, and carrying your own refillable water bottle on planes is another greenwash, the same old reduce, reuse, recycle that does not change underlying systems of natural resource consumption.

Screen Shot 2019-09-11 at 10.56.34 AM.png

Figure 8: Two Storytelling Strategies 

We need both strategies. 1. Extinction Rebellion to encourage politicians to declare ‘climate emergency’ in nation after nation. 2. Break away from the Business-As-Usual Growth Spiral, and get liberated and free for ‘new story’ to emerge, which as Hannah Arendt says is the “power of locomotion” to “arrive at a place where freedom rules” and “our decider for liberation, to be free of oppression ends, and the desire for freedom as a political way of life begins.”

146-1468597_drawing-spirals-cloud-spiral-clouds-vector-pattern.png

Figure 9: Storytelling Constellation Transformation (source)

We need a new storytelling constellation, an entire field of Extinction Rebellions and break aways to create ‘new stories’ that have never existed before.

How do you change storytelling constellations? It’s a Tamara-land question. Its understanding that there are a multiplicity of stories, and we have to step up and deal with the storytelling multiplicity in all its complexity dynamics. We have to get beyond trying to force everyone onto the monologic of Business-As-Usual Growth Spiral, what is called in neoliberal discourse, the ‘There Is No Alternative’ (TINA) Narrative. Rather than TINA Narrative, we can start to study the whole storytelling constellation and address transformative change.

We are doing a GAIA STORYTELLING FOR GAIA LEADERSHIP – WEIMAR, VILLA INGRID, 15-18 APRIL 2020: An event hosted by the European School of Governance (EUSG). Join us there.  Find out more about it.

References

Arendt, Hannah. (1963). On Revolution. NY: The Viking Press.

Boje, D. M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land”. Academy of Management journal, 38(4), 997-1035. [PDF] davidboje.com

Boje, D. M. (2008). Storytelling Organizations. Sage.

Boje, D. M. (2011a). Storytelling and the Future of Organizations: An Antenarrative Handbook.London: Routledge.

Boje, D. M. (2019a). Storytelling in the global age: There is no Planet B. World Scientific.

Boje, D. (2019b), “The Future of the “Spiral Paradigm” in Climate Action”, Boje, D.and Sanchez, M. (Ed.) The Emerald Handbook of Management and Organization Inquiry, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-551-120191015

Boje, D. M., & Adorisio, A. L. M. (2008). Living between Myths at Wells Fargo Bank. Pp. 127-138 in Monica Kostera (ed.) Mythical Inspirations for Organizational Realities. NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Haraway, Donna J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Jørgensen, K. M., & Boje, D. M. (2010). Resituating narrative and story in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(3), 253-264.

Nelson, Ilka Blue (2013). Storytelling Beyond the Anthropocene. https://issuu.com/latorica/docs/livingscript

Plato. The Republic. Accessed Sep 11 2019 at http://www.idph.net/conteudos/ebooks/republic.pdf

Call for Elemental Storytelling beyond the Multispecies Storytelling

It’s time for the Storytelling Revolution. We need to go beyond humancentric storytelling. Donna Haraway (2016) has called for ‘multispecies storytelling.’ I support it, and want to call for something beyond it, an ‘Elemental Storytelling’ of water, air, earth, and fire elements. Why? Because ‘True Storytelling’ has to be more than humancentric, and more than multispecies. Neoliberal economics of market capitalism is pushing ‘greenwashing’, the myth making of ‘triple bottom line’ that is just the profit bottom line, and the ‘circular economy’ that is just the growth economy of elemental resource extraction.

The decline of elementals has played a supporting role in the history of philosophic and religious thought, and all that humancentric storytelling. The Industrial Revolution, and the Post-industrial Service Revolution and the Digital Revolution are not leading us to the green revolution to deal with emergencies of the Anthropocene . I joined Extinction Rebellion, but I am not convinced rebellion will get politicians to make policy changes, or prompt the monarch, the oligarchy, or the democracy-archy to make the systemic changes needed to keep average global temperature to the 1.5 degree Celsius jump since the Industrial Revolution. As Hannah Arendt (1963: 22-23) put it its time for “No-rule” no-archy, no single rule monarchy or tyrant, no corporate rule oligarchy, and no majority rule demos (democracy).  I was born in the U.S. and it demos has elected the tyrant, who installs fossil fuel executives and climate deniers in the institutions. Brexit is making its exit, and Australia and Brazil are setting the Earth on fire.

I have been teaching university classes and facilitating workshops in Europe, US, and down under, in the relation between ‘True Storytelling’ and the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals as their problem-based-learning experience.

image5.png

Figure 1: True Storytelling and the 17 UN SDGs https://truestorytelling.org 

Teaching at the universities around the world, I noticed ‘Climate Change Is Conspicuously Absent From College Textbooks’ (see Marlene Simons, 2018). This is certainly true of the business-as-usual texts used in core courses of the world’s management schools. As partial remedy, I assign Rachel Carson’s (1962) Silent Spring, Schumacher’s (1973) Small is Beautiful, and Paul Ekins (1993) Limits to Growth.

If only the UN and EU Agenda 2030 would work. The problem is becoming widely known. Agenda 2030 has been colonized, co-opted, and corrupted by business storytelling, by the business modeling myth making in the plots of triple bottom line (3BL) and circular economy (CE).

Triple Bottom Line (3BL) has the core drivers (greed, growthmania, and fear) and manifests visions spirals of waste, pollution, degradation, depletion, exploitation, poverty, corruption, deprivation, and increasing inequalities of Globalization mythology.

3bl slide as it is

Figure 2: Triple Bottom Line (3BL) always put Profit on top of the pyramid, overpowering Planet and People

The Circular Economy (CE) is another version of TBL, one that is always about pursuit of economic growth, by reusing, repairing, remaking, reusing (material recycling, aka remanufacturing), as if that circularity would actually result in consuming less and less of the Earth’s natural resources. CE is bing pushed by McKinsey & Company. (2014) and a flock of consultants colonizing the EU and UN Agenda 2030.

Screen Shot 2019-09-08 at 7.49.40 AM.png

Figure 3: The Circularity Logic of the Circular Economy (CE), adapted from Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2016) & Zink & Geyer, 2017)

“The concept of the circular economy is intended to align sustainability with economic growth – in other words, more cars, more microchips, more buildings. For example, the European Union states that the circular economy will “foster sustainable economic growth” (see How Circular is the Circular Economy?).

My colleagues Francisco Valenzuela and Steffen Böhm have an excellent critique of CE. And the Guardian (2017) put it this way “Circular economy isn’t a magical fix for our environmental woes“.  It’s no wonder the EU and UN are so enamored with CE:

“Little wonder. The circular economy model – which aims to use closed-loop production to keep resources in play for as long as possible – is presented as a pragmatic, win-win solution; an almost magical fix for our environmental woes… But this vision ignores the fact that on a finite planet endless economic growth is not an option. And it fails to see that solving our ecological crises means diluting the power of global corporations – not propping them up” (Guardian 2017 by Micha Narberhaus and Joséphine von Mitschke-Collande).

Research by Zink and Geyer (2017: 593) questions the CE engineering-centric assumptions.

“However, proponents of the circular economy have tended to look at the world purely as an engineering system and have overlooked the economic part of the circular economy. Recent research has started to question the core of the circular economy—namely, whether closing material and product loops does, in fact, prevent primary production.”

There are a growing set of critiques of CE (from my critique of CE on Wikipedia). For example, Allwood (2014, 446) discussed the limits of CE ‘material circularity’, and questioned the desirability of the CE in a reality with growing demand. Does CE secondary production activities (reuse, repair, & remake) actually reduce, or ;displace,; primary production (natural resource extraction)?  The problem CE overlooks, its untold story, is how displacement is governed mainly by market forces (McMillan et al., 2012). It’s the tired old narrative, that the invisible hand of market forces will conspire to create full displacement. of virgin material of the same kind (Zink & Geyer, 2017). In the Journal of Production, the critique of Korhonen, Nuur, Feldmann, and Birkie (2018) is that “the basic assumptions concerning the values, societal structures, cultures, underlying world-views and the paradigmatic potential of CE remain largely unexplored.” 

How can Multispecies and Elemental Storytelling Help? Humancentric storytelling is insufficient to the task of responding to the growing catastrophes of the Anthropocene era. A multispecies  storytelling (Haraway, 2016) takes us closer to understanding the nature of living systems of Earth.  It can help us begin to deconstruct the fallacies of 3BL and CE myth making. We need to start Gaiadialogues, storytelling conversations with Gaia. My colleagues and I are working with several labs at European School of Governance on such an initiative (read about it here).

I want to take it a step further by suggesting Elemental Storytelling as a Gaiadialogue. As you know I have been writing about the element water, and how its being colonized and co-opted, even corrupted by water capitalism, by the privatization and commercialization of water.

cover water book Boje.png

The book is in review at World Scientific Press. It can be downloaded here until it is published. As global warming happens, Gaia’s water on the surface, in the atmosphere, heats up, and since water is life, less life will exist on Earth. A hotter ocean water kills fish and the coral reefs. Hotter climate meals the ices sheets and glaciers, raising the sea levels, and putting coastal communities at risk. With hotter oceans and atmospheric vapor there are more hurricanes that are more intense. The global warming heats the ocean water and it becomes more acidic. As global warming occurs more of the water is retained in the atmospheric water vapor, and less falls to earth, so there is less fresh water in the hydrological cycle. If and when the average global temperature exceeds 4 degree Celsius increase since Industrial Revolution, growing food will happen near the poles, and most of humanity will find the Earth very, very inhospitable, as will most all living species. This is what multispecies storytelling is telling us.

There was several thousand years ago a reverence and respect for the elementals: water, air, earth, and fire. Now the elementals are treated as less important than humans and all the species.  We have to find a new path to a zero-growth capitalism (Ekins, 1993), to small is beautiful (Schmacher, 1973), or we are in for a very silent spring (Carson, 1962) for our grandchildren’s children.

References

Allwood, J. M. 2014. Squaring the circular economy: The role of recycling within a hierarchy of material management strategies. In Handbook of recycling: State-of-the-art for practitioners, analysts, and scientists, edited by E.Worrell andM. Reuter. Waltham, MA, USA: Elsevier.

Arendt, Hannah. (1990). On Revolution. 1963. New York: Viking Press.

Carson, R. (1962/2009). Silent spring.

Ekins, P. (1993). ‘Limits to growth’and ‘sustainable development’: grappling with ecological realities. Ecological Economics, 8(3), 269-288.

Haraway, Donna J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544-552.

McKinsey & Company. (2014). Moving toward a circular economy. Accessed Sep 8 2019 at www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-andresource-productivity/our-insights/moving-toward-a-circulareconomy.

McMillan, C. A., S. J. Skerlos, and G. A. Keoleian. (2012). Evaluation of the metals industry’s position on recycling and its implications for environmental emissions. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(3): 324–333.

Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: a study of ecomonics as if people mattered. Vintage.

Valenzuela, Francisco;  Böhm, Steffen. (2017) Against wasted politics: A critique of the circular economy Organizing for the post-growth economy Ephemera Journal. 17.1: pp. 23-60.

Zink, T., & Geyer, R. (2017). Circular economy rebound. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 593-602.

Critique of Circular Economy as Delusional Storytelling Discourse

 

Antenarrative Blog Post by David M. Boje Aug 1 2019

Why the Circular Economy Narrative is Delusional Storytelling? It is delusional storytelling discourse because circular economy assumes that economic growth can happen while exceeding the nine planetary limits of life support systems. Sadly, the circular economy narrative and the logic of circularity that needs to be challenged as ‘circular reasoning’ have colonized both the United Nations Agenda 2030 and the European Union Agenda 2030.

What is the circular economy? “A circular economy (often referred to simply as “circularity” is an economic system aimed at minimizing waste and making the most of resources. In a circular system resource input, and waste, emission, and energy leakage are minimized by slowing, closing, and narrowing energy and material loops; this can be achieved through long-lasting design, maintenance, repair, reuseremanufacturing, refurbishing, and recycling” (Wikipedia.com/Circular_economy). The advocates of ‘circular economy’ are consulting firms such as McKinsey, attempting to convince their clients: “a sustainable world does not mean a drop in the quality of life for consumers, and can be achieved without loss of revenue or extra costs for manufacturers.”

I just put in this critique of circular economy in the wikipedia webpage.

Critiques of circular economy (posted as change Aug 1 2019) t

“The logic of the ‘circular economy’ narrative and discourse: business can be as profitable as it has been in the linearity model of grow now, clean up later (focus on short-term gains at expense of long-term externalities). While it is possible to somewhat reduce, reuse, and recycle, in its circularity the circular economy is all about sustainable economy, and sustainable development without limits to growth, that can keep placing more demands for additional natural resources, evermore growth, and does not account for exceeding nine planetary limits on the carrying capacity for all life on planet Earth. Circular economy uses the same logic as ‘triple bottom line’ and therefore merits the same critique. Triple Bottom Line (3BL) of people, planet and profit (aka economic prosperity or by the economic, equity and environment (aka, Triple Bottom Line or 3BL), puts profit/economic ahead of people/equity and planet/environment. As with 3BL, circular economy has robust measures of profit/economic variables but not much on the people/equity or planet/enironment. The premise of the Circular Economy is a set of boundary conditions that ensure all activity translates to contributing toward positive impact for the Triple Bottom Line (3BL) people, planet and profit (aka economic, equity, & environment)

‘Given the all too obvious social and environmental crises associated with out-of-bounds growth capitalism, the circular economy has been one of the main references for rebuilding and reforming a political economy of sustainable growth’ (Valenzuela & Böhm, 2017: 23)” (wikipedia.com/Circular_economy).

I will elaborate by deconstruction of circular economy and put this consultant’s strategy to co-opt the EU and UN into historical perspective.

“In January 2012, a report was released entitled Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. The report, commissioned by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation and developed by McKinsey & Company, was the first of its kind to consider the economic and business opportunity for the transition to a restorative, circular model” (Wikipedia.com/Circular_economy).

The fallacious logic is that circularity narrative is that business can be as profitable as it has been in the linearity model of grow now, clean up later (focus on short-term gains at expense of long-term externalities), which is pretty much status quo business model of late modern capitalism. My assessment is that the narrative self-deconstructs: While it is possible to somewhat reduce, reuse, and recycle, in its circularity the circular economy is all about sustainable economy, and sustainable development without limits to growth, that can keep placing more demands for additional natural resources, evermore growth, and does not account for exceeding nine planetary limits on the carrying capacity for all life on planet Earth. Two clients for circular economy (aka circularity) consulting are the United Nations and the European Union.

Agenda 2030 began with In June 1992, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, more than 178 countries adopted Agenda 21, a comprehensive plan of action to build a global partnership for sustainable development to improve human lives and protect the environment.

The 8 Millennium Development Goals of the United Nations, initiated 2000, to reduce extreme poverty by 2015,spanned the period between 2000 and 2015.

United Nations gathered in 2015, in New York City, to adopt 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that rely on more than 150 specific targets. SDGs explicitly address the impact of a tidal wave of economic change, which we are witnessing at a global level.

The UN Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development was adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015. It provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. … The MDGs were replaced by 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300).  On 10 October 2018, ECOSOC and the Second Committee of the General Assembly of the United Nations held a joint meeting on Circular economy for the SDGs: From concept to practice.

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is an action plan known as the Triple Bottom Line (3BL) of peopleplanet and profit (aka economic prosperity). There are 17integrated and indivisible goals, which balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economicequity and environment (aka, Triple Bottom Line or 3BL).

The premise of the Circular Economy is a set of boundary conditions that ensure all activity translates to contributing toward positive impact for the Triple Bottom Line (3BL) peopleplanet and profit (aka economic, equity, & environment). Therefore the 17 goals, and the associated 169 targets and 232 (non-repeating) indicators, represent a strategy plan framework to measure and evaluate the benefits and costs of the Circular Economy.

UNITED NATIONS AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY NARRATIVE TOOK ROOT IN THE LAST FEW YEARS

“Circular Economy for the SDGs: From Concept to Practice General Assembly and ECOSOC Joint Meeting  Draft Concept and Programme for the joint meeting of the Economic and Financial (Second Committee) of the 73 UN General Assembly and the UN Economic and Social Council” accessed Aug 1 2019 at https://www.un.org/en/ga/second/73/jm_conceptnote.pdf

“In recent years, the circular economy has gained increasing prominence as a tool which presents solutions to some of the world’s most pressing cross- cutting sustainable development challenges. By addressing root causes, the concept of a circular economy, an economy in which waste and pollution do not exist by design, products and materials are kept in use, and natural systems are regenerated provides much promise to accelerate implementation of the 2030 Agenda”

The EU Agenda 2030 is a commitment to eradicate poverty and achieve sustainable development by 2030 world-wide, ensuring that no one is left behind (Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” including its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets was adopted on 25 September 2015 by Heads of State and Government at a special UN summit).

Screen Shot 2019-08-01 at 10.19.24 AM.png

At the heart of the UN 17 SDGs is the ‘circular economy’ strategy to give a new boost to jobs, growth and investment and to develop a carbon neutral, resource-efficient and competitive economy. According to the circular economy narrative, plotline, “Products and services designed in a circular way can minimize resource use and foster materials’ reuse, recovery and recyclability down the road” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1551871195772&uri=CELEX:52019DC0190#footnote2

The problem as I discussed in previous posts is that biosphere is the foundation of life on earth, not profit/economics. These SDG’s are fundamental to life on earth.

biosphere sdgs

 

These social SDGs are important and necessary

society sdgs

These economic ones are Not foundational to continued life on the planet.

economy sdgs

In short, circular economy puts SDGs 7, 8, 9, and 12 as the priority, when what needs to happen is deconstruct the whole narrative monologic that sustainable development is possible if the nine planetary limits are being transgressed (Rockström et al, 2009).

December 2015, the Commission adopted a Circular Economy Action Plan (REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan

COM/2019/190 final accessed Aug 1 2019 at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1551871195772&uri=CELEX:52019DC0190#footnote2).

In the EU, “ In 2016, circular activities such as repair, reuse or recycling generated almost €147 billion in value added while standing for around €17.5 billion worth of investments” (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1551871195772&uri=CELEX:52019DC0190#footnote2).

I would love it if circular economy were an actual plan to reduce plastic production and consumption, plastic pollution, and actual generate zero growth in the plastic production, distribution and consumption.  It is voluntary! It is oriented to the small and medium sized corporations, not the plastic giants, and to consumers volunteering to change their plastic consumerism habits and plastic lifestyle.

“The strategy also identifies key actions enabling multi-stakeholder engagement and collaboration along the value chain. For instance, the call from the Commission on stakeholders to make voluntary pledges triggered strong momentum in the industry to boost the uptake of recycled plastics in products. However, as identified in the accompanying document assessing these pledges, more efforts are necessary to reach the objective set out in the strategy, namely to ensure that 10 million tones of recycled plastics find their way into new products by 2025” (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1551871195772&uri=CELEX:52019DC0190#footnote2).

For more critique of Circular Economy see the following:

Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H. (2017). Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition. Energy research & social science, 31, 60-69.

Milne, Markus J.(2005). “From soothing palliatives and towards ecological literacy: A critique of the Triple Bottom Line.” Accessed Aug 1 2019 at https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/1551/From_soothing_palliatives_and_towards_ecological_literacy.pdf

Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business ethics quarterly, 14(2), 243-262.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E. F., … & Nykvist, B. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature461: 472-475.

Valenzuela, F., & Böhm, S. (2017). Against wasted politics: A critique of the circular economy. ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 17(1), 23-60.Accessed Aug 1 2019 at http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/30441/1/PubSub8234_Valenzuela.pdf